Feedback: How to Take it and Use it - article

Feedback can help you write a more engaging book. First, thank anyone who takes the time to read your book. Their time and energy deserve appreciation. It’s best to listen to the critique and to not argue. Take notes. Ask questions, but don’t defend your work. Opening up to the input of others will strengthen your work. Your readers will offer many suggestions. Some will be worthy of your time and revision efforts. Some feedback will be best forgotten. The following discussion will help you navigate the emotional feedback waters.

What should you do when your emotions get in the way?

Almost every writer has felt their hackles rise in the face of feedback. You worked hard on that scene. Who dares to disparage the elegance of your writing? You are close to your work. An emotional response makes sense. Take a deep breath and listen. Many writers have to take a cooling off period to implement feedback effectively. Put the manuscript in a drawer for a day, or even a week. After this break, take it out and give it a look. There is nothing like perspective that comes with time.

What kind of feedback should you avoid?

Some feedback is not helpful. This feedback can be given with the best of intentions but it might not serve your purpose. For example, perhaps an author, a romance novelist, is begging you to add some romantic interest to your intense black ops novel. Would a romantic subplot advance the main plot of your book? If not, you should thank the author for the suggestion and move on with your convert operations. Feedback should serve your purpose. Seek feedback from professionals with specific genre experience.

What kind of feedback should you embrace?

The best kind of feedback will help you strengthen your novel. It will address structure and characterization. It will cover authenticity and tension. It may cause you to feel deep emotions. Feedback that makes you dig deeper into the emotional core of your story is always a good thing. It will cause you to simplify and clarify your intent and purpose. A strong indicator of valuable feedback is that it comes from more than one source. If you have 10 reviewers provide out the same suggestion, it would be wise to listen and revise.

Avoid the extremes of never listening to feedback and accepting every word of feedback. You want to find the middle ground. Always consider the source of your feedback. The more professional the source, the more likely it is that you should listen, but never take every suggestion. Weigh each one carefully against your vision and revise accordingly. Finally, be a class act and acknowledge everyone who offers feedback. Many authors choose to do this on the acknowledgement page of their book. It’s a professional courtesy.

Share this story
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Welcome to the ALC Amanda!
  • Thanks and helps when you are a new comer to ALC ...... hope to read more.
  • With AT THE EDGE published and out there, I keep asking for feedback; it's helpful! I think readers can help me define the style and direction of my next book at this point. My local writer's group--as long as we followed the rule of "sandwich your criticism between two positives"--was great for getting perspective on pace, time, and editing details. I love Dobias' "creative destruction" comment. That's what it feels like, but it often leads to something more creative and readable!
  • I agree with you to a certain extent and that would be when dealing with these people face to face in a group of peers that have been identified as to their skills. I would agree with this when speaking of reader reviews- after all that's who we are writing for. Too many times online and in writing forums there are unidentified people who spend their leisure time rewriting other peoples work to the extent that I have seen them leave a message to a person that they have not been listening to what they've been telling them to do. Too often I see people writing someone else version of their own work in the hope that that person might actually be someone such as an agent or publisher- I'm fairly certain the chance of that is quite slim. Other times I've seen it lead to writers block as someone realizes that their one paragraph of writing elicited 4 pages of creative destruction. The notion of always staying quiet with whatever unreal justification such as are always given- these people took time out of their busy schedule to help you- it's rude to defend your work when they didn't have to give you such valuable help. Those rules foster bullying and it works quite well for them in forums where they don't have to face other people directly and have a forum full of followers to stand with. The only reason then that it is unwise to speak up is that it will result in instant flaming and so its best to be quite and no longer use that group. On the other hand if you want your final work to look like it was written by acewriter123 then maybe you should let him ghost write it for you. So, yes if you know who these people are and you can respect them by all means quietly take notes. Otherwise sometimes its best to make a judgement to remove yourself quietly because there is a reason these people are there with no clear identity and its not to help you. Otherwise it is better to realize that there are no rules that demand that these people even read your work before they begin to critique it. I've seen that happen and it's easily identifiable. Yet no one ever controls it and that begs the question of where is the professionalism here? I think I would trust the reader more than any forum.
  • Thanks Molly, for this superb guide. I am a new comer to the ALC and I am already enjoying your postings.